Python global variables vs classesTags: python testing question
In programming class, the guys sitting next to me found this amazing thing,
where you could setup a static class, put variables into it, and treat it as a
normal variables, so that in functions, you do not need to call it via
# The 'global' class class glo: val = 0 def addone(): return glo.val+1 glo.val = addone() print glo.val
I decided to test to see if using the static class as a ‘global variable’ really was more efficient than using global variables in functions.
import time # Static 'global' class class glo: val = 0 gloval = 0 # A global variable # For timing classacctime = 0 gloacctime = 0 # For testing trytimes = 100 upto = int(1e4) def addoneclass(): # Adds one to glo.val glo.val += 1 def addonevar(): # Adds one to gloval global gloval gloval += 1 # Begin testing for class variable for trys in xrange(trytimes): begintime = time.time() for i in xrange(upto): addoneclass() glo.val = 0 # Reset classacctime += time.time()-begintime # Begin testing for global variable for trys in xrange(trytimes): begintime = time.time() for i in xrange(upto): addonevar() gloval = 0 # Reset gloacctime += time.time()-begintime # Print results print "Class Test: ave: %fs, total: %fs" % (classacctime/trytimes, classacctime) print "Variables Test: ave: %fs, total: %fs" % (gloacctime/trytimes, gloacctime)
The above code gave me the output:
Class Test: ave: 0.009418s, total: 0.941771s Variables Test: ave: 0.007923s, total: 0.792300s
Don’t listen to everything your friends have to say. Test first.